Archive
(173 Total Articles)Page 2 of 5.
Public hearings are set on a proposed rate increase for Missouri-American Water, so the piece affects a drinking-water utility’s pricing and state review process. The excerpt does not say whether the case also involves new construction, compliance work, or the size of the request.
The piece is about a wastewater project moving into the bidding phase, which means the system is advancing a capital project rather than a policy or compliance item. For other utilities facing the same kind of project, the immediate issue is procurement and the timing of construction work; the excerpt does not say what the scope, cost, or funding terms are.
Wausau is extending city payment of the homeowner portion of lead service line replacement while also bringing back a mandatory replacement rule. The piece matters for drinking-water systems because it shows how a utility can pair financing with compliance to accelerate lead pipe removal for affected properties.
Grand Strand Water and Sewer Authority is planning major drinking-water work to address PFAS in its supply. For other utilities under the same rule pressure, the story points to treatment upgrades and financing as the main paths, but it does not say which technologies or schedules the authority has chosen.
The piece says the end of supplemental federal water funding will shift more cost pressure to state and local governments. For utilities, that affects how drinking water and wastewater projects are financed, especially capital work that had depended on added federal support.
The story is about a proposed drinking-water rate increase at MVWA and how that would affect customer bills. It matters to systems facing the same affordability and rate-setting pressure, but the excerpt does not say whether the increase is tied to specific capital work, operating costs, or a formal commission case.
The piece is about the lapse in federal water program funding and the push to renew it. For systems that rely on those programs, the issue is whether planned project funding and related compliance work continue without interruption.
Corpus Christi’s effort to use desalination as a drought response appears to have run into financial and political trouble. For utilities facing the same kind of supply stress, the story points to the complications that can come with trying to build new treatment capacity instead of relying on existing water sources.
Holland BPW is taking a step toward replacing lead-lined water lines, which puts this in drinking-water compliance and infrastructure work for a named utility. The excerpt does not say how many lines are involved, what the step is, or whether financing has been approved.
Gulfport is looking at how to pay for a large stormwater project, with grants and loans among the options. The story matters for other cities weighing financing for drainage work because it points to the funding side of a local stormwater need, not a finished project or a regulatory action.
Wausau is working on how to pay for lead service line replacement and is considering a local ordinance that would require participation. The piece matters for drinking-water systems because it affects lead compliance work, customer connection rules, and the pace of replacement on private property as well as utility lines.
The story is about a proposed drinking water rate increase at a local water authority. It affects customer bills and the utility's affordability setting, but the excerpt does not say why the increase is being proposed or whether the authority tied it to a specific project or compliance need.
Garfield Heights is moving ahead with a sewer project aimed at reducing flooding. The piece matters for local wastewater and stormwater systems because it signals a capital project that will change how the city manages wet-weather flows.
Pismo Beach approved a large set of contracts tied to Central Coast Blue, which signals a project moving into spending and procurement rather than planning alone. For other systems, this is a reminder that major regional water projects can turn on local contract approvals and financing decisions before construction or service changes are visible. The excerpt does not say what the contracts cover, how the money is structured, or what schedule the project follows.
Oswego is looking at bridge financing while a Lake Michigan water loan stays delayed. The piece concerns how the delay affects funding for a drinking-water project and what interim borrowing would mean for the system.
A Texas drinking water system is getting funding to replace old pipes after losing a large share of treated water. For similar utilities, the story shows that infrastructure loss can trigger capital replacement work and outside financing, but it does not say whether the project will fully address the leak problem, whether rates will change, or whether the money comes from a specific state or federal program.
Indiana American Water is passing PFAS settlement credits back to customers, which affects drinking-water bills and shows how contaminant settlement money can flow through to utility accounts. The source does not say how the credits were calculated, which customers receive them, or whether any related treatment or compliance work is also underway.
Social Circle is planning a new wastewater treatment plant. For systems facing the same need, this points to capital planning, treatment capacity, and the financing path tied to a facility build; the excerpt does not say the plant size, cost, schedule, or funding terms.
Great Lakes Water Authority is urging a statewide funding strategy in Michigan after a task force report, so the piece is about how water system capital needs would be financed and distributed. For other utilities facing the same report or funding gap, the issue is whether state-level money, revolving funds, or another structure will be used to support projects and compliance work.
EPA announced a WIFIA loan for a Tennessee city, which points to federal financing for a local water infrastructure project. For other utilities, the story signals how major capital work can be advanced through loan support tied to drinking-water or wastewater system needs, but the excerpt does not say which system is involved or what project the money will cover.
The piece is about Providence residents and property owners getting lead service lines removed, which ties directly to drinking-water compliance and replacement work at the system level. The excerpt also points to new federal funds, so the story changes financing for a local lead-pipe program, but it does not say how many lines are involved or what specific schedule or regulatory trigger applies.
Buchanan’s commissioners approved spending on a project to replace lead water lines. For other drinking-water systems, the story points to lead service line work as a local capital project that can move forward once the utility or city authorizes funding.
The piece is about how a large desalination project in South Texas would be paid for, so it centers on financing for a water supply project rather than the technology itself. For systems facing similar projects, the main issue is who bears the cost and how the work would be financed; the excerpt does not say which utility is leading the project, what the budget is, or what timeline applies.
Zavalla is getting state grant money to replace or repair a drinking water system the story describes as failing. For other small systems facing the same kind of award, the change is access to outside capital for work that would otherwise have to be financed locally or delayed.
The story is about a sewer repair plan that would be financed with grants and loans. It affects a wastewater system’s capital work and the funding needed to carry it out.