Archive
(173 Total Articles)Page 1 of 1.
The story concerns a Texas desalination effort tied to a foreign supplier and the cost of water Texas could owe if the project goes forward. For systems facing the same kind of project, the issue is how much a desalination contract can affect long-term water supply costs and financing; the excerpt does not say whether any utility has signed a final deal or what project terms would apply.
The story concerns changes approved for a desalination project near Doheny State Beach and a pushed-back schedule. It affects a reuse project and the permitting or project timeline for the system that would build it.
Arizona is looking at desalination and reuse options in Mexico, which could affect future water supply planning for utilities that rely on imported or cross-border sources. The excerpt does not say which system would pay for the study, what facilities are involved, or whether any utility has committed to build anything.
Corpus Christi is using treated wastewater for industrial use, which reduces demand on its freshwater supply. For systems with industrial customers or reuse programs, the story points to an operational change in how nonpotable water is supplied.
The piece is about how a large desalination project in South Texas would be paid for, so it centers on financing for a water supply project rather than the technology itself. For systems facing similar projects, the main issue is who bears the cost and how the work would be financed; the excerpt does not say which utility is leading the project, what the budget is, or what timeline applies.
The story says residents will have a chance to comment on a proposed desalination plant near Texas City. For systems facing similar proposals, it points to the local siting and public-input step that can shape whether a water supply project moves forward and how it is presented to the public; the excerpt does not say the plant’s size, cost, source water, or permitting status.
The piece says the Port of Corpus Christi obtained a discharge permit for the Harbor Island desalination project. That affects the project’s ability to move ahead on permitting and compliance matters for a water supply facility, but the excerpt does not say whether construction has started, what the discharge will contain, or what other approvals remain.
John Byrum’s departure is a governance and operations change for the Nueces River Authority, which sits inside a Texas reuse and desalination effort tied to Corpus Christi. The excerpt does not say whether the resignation changes any project schedule, financing, or permitting step.
The piece is about a regulatory guidebook for water reuse. For utilities and agencies planning reuse projects, the practical question is how the guidebook frames permits, standards, and compliance steps under existing state and local rules.
Corpus Christi faces a potential large repayment tied to a desalination project that did not move forward. For systems pursuing reuse or desalination, the story is about financing risk, stranded project costs, and what a failed facility can leave a utility or city owing after the work stops.
The piece says the Las Virgenes-Triunfo system secured financing for its Pure Water Project. That points to a utility-level capital project and funding decision that affects how the system will build and pay for recycled water work.
The piece is about EPA-backed financing for a recycled drinking water project in Southern California. It matters for the utility or utilities that will build and operate the reuse system and for any system facing similar federal or state revolving fund loan support for potable reuse projects.
Environmental groups are asking for a hearing on a proposed desalination facility in Texas City. The story matters for a named water project because it can affect whether the plant advances and what review it faces; the excerpt does not say who would build it, what permits are involved, or whether the hearing has been granted.
Palm Coast is weighing whether to prohibit direct potable reuse, so the story affects how a Florida utility or local government might set rules for a future reuse program. The excerpt does not say whether Palm Coast already has a reuse project, what facilities would be involved, or whether any ordinance is close to adoption.
The story says a proposed desalination plant near Galveston Bay has cleared an initial review by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and is now open for public comment. For other drinking-water systems, it shows the project is still in the permitting stage and has not yet reached construction or operation.
Texas officials and a desalination board are in a funding dispute tied to a coastal water supply project. For other utilities facing the same kind of project delay or cash shortage, the immediate issue is whether planned supply additions can move forward or have to be slowed, redesigned, or deferred.
Corpus Christi City Council rejected a proposed Inner Harbor desalination project. For other U.S. utilities, the story shows a local governing body blocking a desalination supply option before it moves ahead, which can reset planning, financing, and permitting work tied to the project.
The piece asks whether desalination could help Arizona make up for Colorado River supply cuts. For systems in Arizona that depend on that river, it points to a potential reuse or supply-planning response, but the excerpt does not say that any utility has approved, funded, or started a project.
Reno has started work on a project to turn wastewater into drinking water, which puts a reuse-to-potable supply project squarely inside this beat. It affects the city system that will build and operate the plant and the treatment standards it must meet; the excerpt does not say the cost, schedule, capacity, or regulatory approvals.