Archive
(173 Total Articles)Page 2 of 5.
Wausau is extending city payment of the homeowner portion of lead service line replacement while also bringing back a mandatory replacement rule. The piece matters for drinking-water systems because it shows how a utility can pair financing with compliance to accelerate lead pipe removal for affected properties.
Summerville's PFAS treatment project has entered a public environmental review period. For drinking-water systems facing PFAS compliance deadlines, the story points to another permitting and review step before treatment work can move ahead.
Grand Strand Water and Sewer Authority is planning major drinking-water work to address PFAS in its supply. For other utilities under the same rule pressure, the story points to treatment upgrades and financing as the main paths, but it does not say which technologies or schedules the authority has chosen.
The piece says the end of supplemental federal water funding will shift more cost pressure to state and local governments. For utilities, that affects how drinking water and wastewater projects are financed, especially capital work that had depended on added federal support.
Monmouth is moving into a third phase of lead service line replacement, which means another round of work on the city’s drinking-water distribution system. The source does not say how many lines are included, how the work will be paid for, or whether this phase changes the city’s compliance schedule.
Corpus Christi’s effort to use desalination as a drought response appears to have run into financial and political trouble. For utilities facing the same kind of supply stress, the story points to the complications that can come with trying to build new treatment capacity instead of relying on existing water sources.
Holland BPW is taking a step toward replacing lead-lined water lines, which puts this in drinking-water compliance and infrastructure work for a named utility. The excerpt does not say how many lines are involved, what the step is, or whether financing has been approved.
Gulfport is looking at how to pay for a large stormwater project, with grants and loans among the options. The story matters for other cities weighing financing for drainage work because it points to the funding side of a local stormwater need, not a finished project or a regulatory action.
Wausau is working on how to pay for lead service line replacement and is considering a local ordinance that would require participation. The piece matters for drinking-water systems because it affects lead compliance work, customer connection rules, and the pace of replacement on private property as well as utility lines.
Garfield Heights is moving ahead with a sewer project aimed at reducing flooding. The piece matters for local wastewater and stormwater systems because it signals a capital project that will change how the city manages wet-weather flows.
Orlando has started a lift station upgrade tied to its wastewater system. The story affects collection-system infrastructure and the work a city utility must build and maintain, but the excerpt does not say which station, what failures prompted the project, or whether financing or regulatory pressure is part of it.
The story concerns changes approved for a desalination project near Doheny State Beach and a pushed-back schedule. It affects a reuse project and the permitting or project timeline for the system that would build it.
Pismo Beach approved a large set of contracts tied to Central Coast Blue, which signals a project moving into spending and procurement rather than planning alone. For other systems, this is a reminder that major regional water projects can turn on local contract approvals and financing decisions before construction or service changes are visible. The excerpt does not say what the contracts cover, how the money is structured, or what schedule the project follows.
Oswego is looking at bridge financing while a Lake Michigan water loan stays delayed. The piece concerns how the delay affects funding for a drinking-water project and what interim borrowing would mean for the system.
A Texas drinking water system is getting funding to replace old pipes after losing a large share of treated water. For similar utilities, the story shows that infrastructure loss can trigger capital replacement work and outside financing, but it does not say whether the project will fully address the leak problem, whether rates will change, or whether the money comes from a specific state or federal program.
Arizona is looking at desalination and reuse options in Mexico, which could affect future water supply planning for utilities that rely on imported or cross-border sources. The excerpt does not say which system would pay for the study, what facilities are involved, or whether any utility has committed to build anything.
Social Circle is planning a new wastewater treatment plant. For systems facing the same need, this points to capital planning, treatment capacity, and the financing path tied to a facility build; the excerpt does not say the plant size, cost, schedule, or funding terms.
EPA announced a WIFIA loan for a Tennessee city, which points to federal financing for a local water infrastructure project. For other utilities, the story signals how major capital work can be advanced through loan support tied to drinking-water or wastewater system needs, but the excerpt does not say which system is involved or what project the money will cover.
A state commission is holding a public meeting in Texas City on a desalination plant. For other drinking-water systems, this signals a permitting or review step before a plant can move ahead, but the excerpt does not say who owns the project, what size it is, or what decision the commission is being asked to make.
Des Moines says a newly constructed wetland has been added to a flood management basin to improve water quality. The piece is about a stormwater project that changes how the site manages runoff and treatment, not a utility rate, permit, or enforcement action.
The piece is about Providence residents and property owners getting lead service lines removed, which ties directly to drinking-water compliance and replacement work at the system level. The excerpt also points to new federal funds, so the story changes financing for a local lead-pipe program, but it does not say how many lines are involved or what specific schedule or regulatory trigger applies.
Buchanan’s commissioners approved spending on a project to replace lead water lines. For other drinking-water systems, the story points to lead service line work as a local capital project that can move forward once the utility or city authorizes funding.
The piece is about how a large desalination project in South Texas would be paid for, so it centers on financing for a water supply project rather than the technology itself. For systems facing similar projects, the main issue is who bears the cost and how the work would be financed; the excerpt does not say which utility is leading the project, what the budget is, or what timeline applies.
Zavalla is getting state grant money to replace or repair a drinking water system the story describes as failing. For other small systems facing the same kind of award, the change is access to outside capital for work that would otherwise have to be financed locally or delayed.
The story is about a sewer repair plan that would be financed with grants and loans. It affects a wastewater system’s capital work and the funding needed to carry it out.