Archive
(173 Total Articles)Page 4 of 5.
The piece is about wastewater treatment facility investments for the City of Hendersonville. It likely concerns capital work or financing for plant upgrades, which affects how the system will meet treatment and infrastructure needs.
The piece is about WEFTEC and the issues facing water utilities, with emphasis on funding and revolving funds. It affects drinking-water and wastewater systems that rely on state revolving funds, but the excerpt does not say which specific programs, utilities, or decisions are changing.
New York is distributing water grants and starting a new round of flood-related funding. For systems that want state money, the story signals another financing window, but the excerpt does not say which utilities, projects, or eligibility rules are involved.
The item says the Kentucky Infrastructure Authority and Division of Water are calling for project submissions for 2028. For utilities, that means an early step in the state funding pipeline, but the excerpt does not say which systems, project types, or award amounts are involved.
The piece says the Las Virgenes-Triunfo system secured financing for its Pure Water Project. That points to a utility-level capital project and funding decision that affects how the system will build and pay for recycled water work.
Moundsville’s wastewater utility is getting state funding for upgrades, which points to a capital project rather than a policy or enforcement action. The excerpt does not say what specific plant or collection-system work the money will cover, or whether the award comes with any compliance deadline.
The story says a Los Angeles financing authority received a WIFIA loan for drinking water upgrades. For other systems facing the same financing route, it signals that federal lending is being used to support capital work on drinking-water infrastructure, but the excerpt does not say which facilities are included or what specific upgrades will be built.
The story is about wastewater systems in western Massachusetts facing the cost of stopping sewage discharges to the Connecticut River. It points to financing and compliance pressures on local utilities or municipalities that have to pay for sewer upgrades or related work.
The piece is about federal funding for Great Lakes water systems and how Congress will affect that money. It matters for utilities that rely on revolving funds and other public financing for drinking water and wastewater work.
Indiana American Water is planning a major PFAS treatment buildout for its drinking-water system. The piece matters for systems facing the same contaminant rules because it points to the scale of capital work utilities may need to add to meet PFAS compliance, but the excerpt does not say which treatment technology, service areas, or compliance deadlines are driving the project.
Benton Township is nearing completion of work on its water towers, which points to a drinking-water infrastructure project rather than a policy or rate case. For systems facing the same kind of capital work, the story signals the physical buildout side of utility service; the excerpt does not say what the project costs, how it is financed, or whether it changes capacity or compliance.
The item is about a proposed desalination project tied to WIFA review, so it concerns water supply planning and likely financing for a named system or facility. The source does not say whether the project is inside the United States or whether WIFA is deciding on funding, approval, or another form of review.
The piece is about EPA-backed financing for a recycled drinking water project in Southern California. It matters for the utility or utilities that will build and operate the reuse system and for any system facing similar federal or state revolving fund loan support for potable reuse projects.
The piece is about financing for water infrastructure across selected southern states, so it matters to drinking-water and wastewater systems that depend on revolving funds and other public funding. The excerpt does not say which systems were covered, what projects they need, or whether the discussion centered on rates, loans, or grants.
Bar Nunn is seeking a State Loan and Investment Board loan to replace water meters. The story is about utility financing for a drinking-water system project, with effects on billing accuracy and replacement work for the town's system.
Buffalo says it has finished a $72 million upgrade at the Bird Island wastewater facility. The story matters for systems with aging treatment plants because it points to the scale of capital work needed to keep a major plant in service and compliant.
Centerville received funding for utility work, which means local water or sewer systems will have a clearer path to pay for needed projects. The excerpt does not say which utility lines, treatment assets, or compliance issues the money is tied to.
The story covers a proposed drinking-water rate increase for Illinois American Water and the public and political pushback it drew at a local hearing. For similar utilities, the issue is how rate cases affect customer bills, affordability arguments, and regulatory approval of revenue changes.
Sacramento’s lawsuit over PFAS in groundwater points to drinking-water compliance and the costs of dealing with contaminated source water. For other systems facing the same chemicals rule, this kind of case can shape who pays for investigation, treatment, or cleanup, but the excerpt does not say what remedy the court or settlement produced.
Bunceton is getting state funding for wastewater improvements. For other systems, the story signals a financing step toward plant or collection-system work, but it does not say what facilities will be built or upgraded.
La Crosse Water Utility is proposing a rate increase, which affects what customers pay for the drinking-water system and how the utility finances its operations and planned work. The excerpt does not say what specific costs, projects, or service changes are driving the proposal.
The story is about funding for a green infrastructure project along Chollas Creek in San Diego. For systems facing similar stormwater rules or retrofit deadlines, it points to outside money being used for local stormwater control work rather than to a utilitywide compliance action.
Texas officials and a desalination board are in a funding dispute tied to a coastal water supply project. For other utilities facing the same kind of project delay or cash shortage, the immediate issue is whether planned supply additions can move forward or have to be slowed, redesigned, or deferred.
Hermiston is planning a long-term drinking-water response to PFAS contamination. For other systems facing the same standard, the story points to the need to map the problem, choose treatment or replacement options, and line up funding and construction work before compliance deadlines arrive.
The piece concerns how Wausau may shift some lead service line replacement costs onto homeowners. For other drinking-water systems facing lead pipe inventories and replacement programs, it signals a financing choice that can affect bill impacts and how quickly private-side lead work gets done; the excerpt does not say whether the city has selected a final option or how many homes are affected.