Archive
(173 Total Articles)Page 5 of 5.
The piece asks whether desalination could help Arizona make up for Colorado River supply cuts. For systems in Arizona that depend on that river, it points to a potential reuse or supply-planning response, but the excerpt does not say that any utility has approved, funded, or started a project.
West Virginia lawmakers were briefed on shrinking federal support and other limits on aid for water upgrade projects. For systems in the state, that points to tighter financing for drinking-water and wastewater work and more reliance on state-level funding tools.
New York’s lead service line replacement work is being described as free for some customers but not others. The story affects drinking-water systems that have to decide how to pay for lead pipe removal and how to apply replacement rules across different households and service areas.
North Carolina’s PFAS settlement changes the financial and compliance picture for drinking-water systems that have been dealing with contaminated supplies and cleanup costs. The excerpt does not say which utilities will receive the money, how the reserve will be used, or what treatment or replacement work the settlement will support.
The piece concerns PFAS contamination enforcement tied to a North Carolina water system, with allegations of illegal discharges and a large settlement affecting drinking-water compliance costs. It does not say whether any treatment upgrades, permit changes, or utility governance actions followed from the settlement.
Brunswick is bringing a $20 million drinking-water treatment plant online to deal with PFAS contamination. The story matters for other utilities facing PFAS compliance because it points to a capital project built around treatment rather than a smaller operating fix; the excerpt does not say what treatment process is being used, who paid for it, or what limits the plant is designed to meet.
New York City’s lead service line replacement program is a drinking-water infrastructure story, and the point in the headline is the homeowner cost avoided by free replacements. For other utilities with lead line programs, the story points to how local officials can frame replacement work as a bill relief and compliance issue, not just a construction project; the excerpt does not say how many lines were replaced, what funding source paid for it, or what schedule remains.